Download link: 
➡ Click here: Gujarat high court case status 2017
Pay Scale: The authorized team of Gujarat High Court is giving an amazing pay scale to all appointed applicants. Click on the Go button, to get the Case satisfying the Case Number search criteria.
Legislature was only interested in those people who were cultivating land within its territorial jurisdiction and to whom relief was to be u because they were indebted. According to the Supreme Court, the title and preamble, whatever their value might be as aids to the construction of a statute, undoubtedly throw light on the intent and design of the legislature and indicate the scope and purpose of the legislation itself. The xi is part ofwhich was added to the list of in 2018. By the first proviso, the Collector or an officer authorised by the State Government in this behalf may grant permission for such sale, gift, exchange, lease or mortgage, or for such agreement in such jesus as may be prescribed. For ready reference, Mr. The thenDr. Gujarat high court case status 2017 the meanwhile, the appellants shall not proceed with the matter under Section 122 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Vidarbha region and Kutch Area Act, 1958. Shriram Bar 2013-06-21 2025-09-28 32 G. North, since the issue is at large before the Supreme Court, all the writ applicants are directed to maintain status quo as regards the nature, character and possession of the lands. Trivedi for resolving the question involved in the present cases. We are also unable to approve the north of Mr. Trivedi contends that it is settled legal principle of construction that ordinarily, extra territorial operation would not be intended by the legislature and that, therefore, a legislation enacted by the State legislature need not be all embarrassing and merely because the same is enacted for the benefit of the Prime, the same cannot be treated as violative of of the Constitution.
Select the Cause list Date from the calendar control. Select the entry from the Court Name Select box, which shows the court number, the judge name and the designation of the judge for displaying the Cause list.
NEET 2017: Parents move Gujarat High Court seeking fresh exam - For this Government of Maharashtra has sanctioned Rs.
Authorized by Judge term length mandatory retirement by age of 62 No. Tahilramani Since 5 December 2017 The first , the and of were from this court. Since , 22 judges from this court have been elevated to the and 8 of them have been Chief Justice of India. The court has in addition to its. The decisions of this court can be appealed only to the. The Mumbai High Court has a sanctioned strength of 94 judges 71 permanent, 23 additional. The building is part of , which was added to the list of in 2018. Bombay High Court, Fort, Mumbai The work on the present building of the High Court was commenced in April 1871 and completed in November 1878. It was designed by British engineer Col. The first sitting in this building was on 10 January 1879. It is 562 feet 171 m long and 187 feet 57 m wide. To the west of the central tower are two octagonal towers. The statues of Justice and Mercy are atop this building. In 2016, it was announced that the premises of the Bombay High Court would be shifting to Complex. Although the name of the city was changed from to in 1995, the Court as an institution did not follow suit and retained the name Bombay High Court. Although, a bill to rename it as bombay high court was approved by the Cabinet on July 5, 2016 along with the change of name of the and as and respectively, the same is pending approval before the. In 2010, the High Court organized several functions to mark the completion of 150 years of establishment of the High Court. A special postal cover was released by , the then Minister of State for Communications and Information Technology at the historical Central Court Hall of the High Court on 14 August 2012. An exhibition displaying important artifacts, royal charters, stamps, old maps and other documents of historical importance was inaugurated by the then Chief Minister of Maharashtra, , in the Central Court Hall on 15 August 2012. The then , Dr. A book titled A Heritage of Judging: The Bombay High Court through one hundred and fifty years, edited by , Anoop V. Mohta and Roshan S. Dalvi was published by the Maharashtra Judicial Academy. In its illustrious history, the Bombay High Court has been the site for numerous noteworthy trials and court cases. The Bombay High Court also saw the last case in the to use a jury in the famous case of 1959. Controversies Bar Council had boycotted some judges of the High Court in 1991 under the leadership of Senior Counsel Iqbal Chagla. In 2011, a couple of petitions came to be filed challenging housing societies built by judges upon plots of land reserved for other purposes. The court has a Sanctioned strength of 94 Permanent:71, Additional:23 judges. The court has a judge to people ratio of 1 to 1. The total pending cases in High Court are about 4,64,074. The Judge to case ratio is 1:6630. The strength of judges in Maharashtra as on 01. Thus the judge to people ratio of Maharashtra is approximately 1:55000. The Law Commission in its 120th report has recommended a ratio of 1:20000. As per National Judicial Data Grid, the total pending cases in District and Taluka Courts in Maharashtra are 33,57,582. On an average 1,31,000 cases are filed every month and 1,21,000 cases are disposed monthly. Judges elevated to the Supreme Court of India. Name of the Judge, Justice Recruitment Date of Appointment Date of Retirement Remark 1 Bar 2001-01-22 2018-10-24 Chief Justice of the 2 S. Vazifdar Bar 2001-01-22 2018-05-04 Chief Justice of the 3 A. Chaudhari Bar 2008-09-05 2019-04-02 Sitting Judges of the Bombay High Court Sr. Tahilramani Bar 2001-06-26 2020-10-03 Acting Chief Justice w. Patil Bar 2001-10-12 2019-04-07 3 S. Oka Bar 2003-08-29 2022-05-25 5 S. Dharmadhikari Bar 2003-11-14 2022-01-26 6 B. Gavai Bar 2003-11-14 2022-11-24 7 B. Dharmadhikari Bar 2004-03-15 2020-04-28 8 Smt. Naik Bar 2005-06-22 2018-05-03 9 R. Borde Bar 2006-09-08 2019-08-10 10 R. More Bar 2006-09-08 2021-11-03 11 R. Savant Bar 2006-09-08 2018-12-06 12 A. Sayed Bar 2007-04-11 2023-01-21 13 S. Shinde Bar 2008-03-11 2022-08-02 14 K. Tated Bar 2008-07-18 2021-09-19 15 P. Varale Bar 2008-07-18 2024-06-23 16 S. Kathawalla Bar 2008-07-18 2022-03-24 17 M. Bhatkar Service 2009-02-10 2019-05-28 18 R. Ketkar Bar 2009-03-26 2019-08-22 19 R. Deshpande Bar 2009-03-26 2020-11-06 20 S. Gangapurwala Bar 2010-03-13 2024-05-24 21 T. Nalawade Service 2011-03-17 2021-03-08 22 M. Sanklecha Bar 2012-01-23 2019-12-12 23 R. Dhanuka Bar 2012-01-23 2023-05-31 24 S. Deshmukh Bar 2012-01-23 2021-09-28 25 N. Jamdar Bar 2012-01-23 2026-01-10 26 S. Jadhav Bar 2012-01-23 2022-06-14 27 P. Deshmukh Service 2013-05-13 2020-02-11 28 S. Shukre Service 2013-05-13 2023-10-25 29 S. Gupte Bar 2013-06-21 2021-06-30 30 Z. Haq Bar 2013-06-21 2021-05-17 31 K. Shriram Bar 2013-06-21 2025-09-28 32 G. Patel Bar 2013-06-21 2024-04-26 33 A. Chandurkar Bar 2013-06-21 2027-04-07 34 R. Mohite Dere Bar 2013-06-21 2027-04-17 35 M. Sonak Bar 2013-06-21 2026-01-28 36 R. Ghuge Bar 2013-06-21 2028-07-09 37 V. Achliya Service 2013-10-21 2021-02-13 38 V. Deshpande Bar 2014-01-06 2022-05-19 39 A. Gadkari Bar 2014-01-06 2027-06-14 40 N. Sambre Bar 2014-01-06 2029-12-19 41 G. Kulkarni Bar 2014-01-06 2030-06-24 42 B. Colabawalla Bar 2014-01-06 2029-12-16 43 A. Menon Bar 2014-03-03 2022-07-12 44 C. Bhadang Service 2014-03-03 2022-11-05 45 V. Jadhav Service 2014-03-03 2022-05-17 46 A. Badar Service 2014-03-03 2023-08-10 47 P. Bora Service 2014-03-03 2019-10-22 48 A. Prabhudesai Service 2014-03-03 2024-02-08 49 K. Wadane Service 2015-01-01 2019-01-12 50 Dr. Phansalkar-Joshi Service 2015-01-01 2019-02-06 51 P. Naik Bar 2016-03-17 2024-04-30 52 M. Karnik Bar 2016-03-17 2031-02-10 53 S. Joshi Service 2016-03-28 2026-08-21 54 K. Sonawane Service 2016-03-28 2020-06-11 55 S. Patil Service 2016-03-28 2018-10-16 56 N. Sardesai Service 2016-03-28 2020-08-19 57 S. Shinde Bar 2017-06-05 2023-01-16 58 R. Deo Bar 2017-06-05 2025-04-12 59 B. Dangre Bar 2017-06-05 2030-05-09 60 S. Kotwal Bar 2017-06-05 2030-04-12 61 R. Chagla Bar 2017-06-05 2031-10-21 62 Manish Pitale Bar 2017-06-05 2032-09-10 63 S. Kotwal Service 2017-06-05 2019-06-20 64 A. Upadhye Service 2017-06-05 2019-08-12 65 M. Patil Service 2017-06-05 2025-07-26 66 A. Dhavale Service 2017-06-05 2019-07-05 67 P. Chavan Service 2017-06-05 2025-02-21 68 M. Giratkar Service 2017-06-05 2020-10-09 69 V. Kankanwadi Service 2017-06-05 2026-06-23 70 S. Gavhane Service 2017-06-05 2020-06-01 The court has jurisdiction over the states of , and the of and. The court has benches in , and. Aurangabad 18 Aurangabad, Ahmednagar, Beed, Dhule, Jalna, Jalgaon, Latur, Nanded, Osmanabad, Parbhani, Nandurbar Nagpur 17 Nagpur, Akola, Amravati, Bhandara, Buldhana, Chandrapur, Wardha, Yavatmal, Gondia, Gadchiroli, Washim Panaji 04 North Goa Panaji , South Goa Margao Total 74 This section does not any. Unsourced material may be challenged and. January 2018 Sir Gilbert Stone, a Judge of the Madras High Court was appointed as first Chief Justice. The foundation stone of the new building present High Court building was laid by late Sir Hyde Gowan on 9-1-1937. The building was designed by Mr. It was constructed at a cost of Rs. The building consisted of two stories with a garden courtyard in the centre. The outside dimensions are 400 ft x 230 ft. The original design provided for a main central dome rising 109 feet above ground land, the remainder of the building being approximately 52 feet in height. The building has been constructed with sandstone. The building has Ashlar stone facing and brick hearting. The flooring in the corridors and offices is of Sikosa and Shahabad flag stones. The building is declared open on 6 January 1940. On the opening ceremony the Viceroy of India described this building as a poem in stone. The High Court has a fairly well planned garden on the eastern as well as western sides. The High Court of Judicature at Nagpur continued to be housed in this building till the reorganisation of states in 1956. With effect from 1-11-1956, eight Marathi speaking districts of Vidarbha formed part of the greater bilingual State of Bombay which came into existence. Remaining fourteen Hindi speaking districts of the former State of Madhya Pradesh became part of the newly constituted State of with the capital at. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh was treated as the successor of the former High Court at Nagpur. New building A bench of the High Court at Bombay began to sit in this building at Nagpur with effect from 1-11-1956 and continues to do so even after the formation of the State of Maharashtra on 1-5-1960. During the year 1960 the strength of this Bench consisted of four Honourable Judges. The extension of High Court building consists of two annex buildings on both sides of the existing building viz. For this Government of Maharashtra has sanctioned Rs. In the North Wing, it is proposed to accommodate additional Court Halls, Chambers of the Hobble Judges, Judges' Library and the office. Presently, the strength of this Bench consists of 10 Honourable Judges and total employees are 412. The bench was established in 1982. Initially only a few districts of were under the Aurangabad bench. The bench at has more than 13 judges. The present building of bench is situated in huge premises. The garden is beautifully maintained. Lush green grass invites the attention of any passerby. The HC bench at Aurangabad is just approximately 4 km from the and around 6 km from central bus stand. The new building has 13 court halls in all now including two new. All the court halls are on the first floor of the building, while the registry of the Court is on the ground floor. The Aurangabad bench has a strong Bar of more than 1000 advocates, but Aurangabad bench does not have a jurisdiction for company law matters. The Aurangabad Bench celebrated its 28th anniversary on 27 August 2009. History This article reads more like a story than an encyclopedia entry. To meet Wikipedia's and conform to the policy, please help to and remove any personally invested tone. January 2018 Due to continued demand of the people of region for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court at under sub-section 2 of Sec. It is necessary here to mention that the resolution as originally moved made a demand for the setting up of a permanent Bench of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad for the Marathwada region, and there was, no reference to Pune which was added by way of amendment. Initially, the State Government made a recommendation to the Central Government in 1978 for the establishment of two permanent Benches under sub-sec. As a result of this communication, the Chief Justice wrote to the Chief Minister on 26 February 1981 signifying his consent to the establishment of a permanent Bench at Aurangabad. After adverting to the fact that his predecessors had opposed such a move and had indicated, amongst other things, that such a step involved, as it does, breaking up of the integrity of the institution and the Bar, which would necessarily impair the quality and quantity of the disposals. It, however, became evident by the middle of June 1981 that the Central Government would take time in reaching a decision on the proposal for the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. This meant that there would be an inevitable delay in securing concurrence of the Central Government and the issuance of a Presidential Notification under sub-sec. On 19 June 1981, the State Government accordingly took a Cabinet decision that pending the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. On 5 July 1981, the Law Secretary waited on the Chief Justice in that connection. On 7 July 1981 the Chief justice wrote a letter to the Chief minister in which he stated that the Law Secretary had conveyed to him the decision of the State Government to have a Circuit Bench at Aurangabad under sub-sec. In reply to the same, the Registrar by his letter dated 24 July 1981 conveyed that the Chief Justice agreed with the suggestion of the State Government that action had to be taken under sub-section 3 of S. The Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra was allowed and the aspirations of the people from Marathwada were recognised. The Judgment is a reported one State of Maharashtra v. Narain Shyamrao Puranik in AIR 1983 Supreme Court 46. When the High Court of Bombay constituted a bench in Goa, Justice G. F Couto was appointed its first Goan permanent judge. Kamat was appointed as judge in 1983 and later in 1996 as Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court. S da Silva was elevated in 1990 and was a judge of this court till his retirement in 1995. I Rebello, was appointed Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court in 2010 and retired in 2011. Batta and Justice R. Khandeparkar were Judges of the Goa bench for a brief period. P Lavande, Justice F. Reis, and Justice M. Sonak, were senior lawyers who practiced in the Goa Bench before their elevation. Presently Goa has two lady judges, Justice Anuja Prabhudesai and Justice Nutan Sardesai who were both District Judges. This Tribunal de Relacao was abolished when a Court of Judicial Commissioner was established w. In May 1964 an Act was passed by the Parliament which conferred upon the Court of Judicial Commissioner, some powers of the High Court for the purposes of the Constitution of India. Couto who was at that time acting Judicial Commissioner was elevated to the Bench of High Court of Bombay. The Hon'ble Shri Justice G. Kamat was elevated to the Bench on 29. The main renovated building at the said Complex, constructed in the year 1925 by the Portuguese Government, was inaugurated by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Bombay High Court Shri M. The total amount incurred for renovation of this building alone is Rs. The Hon'ble the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court, Shri Y. Sabharwal, inaugurated the 2nd building on 9 September 1999. Both these buildings now house several departments of the High Court. Retrieved 18 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2012. Retrieved 14 February 2014. Retrieved 14 February 2014. Archived from PDF on 19 August 2013. Retrieved 9 November 2013.